AAP News Vol. 13 No. 6 June 1997, p. 14
© 1997 American Academy of Pediatrics
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hart, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Who's deficient, who's just plain short?: Despite advances, growth hormone decision tough

Carol Hart Ph.D.

When growth hormone (GH) could only be obtained from cadaver pituitaries, little doubt existed about which short children needed treatment.

The expensive treatment was reserved for children with severe growth hormone deficiency (GHD), at risk of reaching an adult height of only 3 1/2 or 4 1/2 feet.

Since recombinant GH became available in 1985, however, it has been tried for "just about everything that's short," including so-called "normal short" children, said Louis Underwood, M.D., FAAP, chief, Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. These children with idiopathic short stature or constitution- "It may be that you accelerate growth but you don't affect the ultimate height these patients achieve," he explained. "Is being a taller adolescent, but not a taller adult, a reasonable goal? There are a couple of studies showing modest gains in adult stature, based on predicted height, and is that modest gain enough?"